Supreme Being?
It is a common belief that those with hair are superior to those who are balding. A full head of hair usually represents youth and vitality where as a balding man is seen as unattractive, boring, and even stressed out. But is this the truth? Does a luscious head of hair make a man superior to those without? Here we compare the famous with hair to the famous without in order to really see if having hair makes you superior to a bald man.
Round One: Matt Hasselbeck vs. Matt Leinart
Both of these men are of the elite few who are part brains and part strength, and have enough of both to be a starting quarterback in the NFL. The one difference, Hasselbeck is bald and Leinart has hair. Who is the superior of the two, let us compare:
Bios/ Stats
HASSELBECK
At age 31 stands 6'-4" tall, weighs in at 223 lbs. and is bald. Married to Elizabeth who is the co-host of the View and a former Survivor winner. Last year signed a six year $47 million contract extension.
LEINART
He is 23 and has a beautiful head of hair. He is 6'-5" and weighs 230 lbs. Won a Heisman Trophy, two NCAA National Championships, and signed a six year contract with AZ Cardinals earlier this year worth over $ 50 million.
The Verdict
Matt Leinart is the clear winner. Although he did date Paris Hilton and at times appears to be cross eyed, he is still clearly the more attractive of the two. and richer. Just being a rookie, we cannot compare their NFL careers but can anyone tell me where Matt Hasselbeck went to College? Guys with hair take a 1-0 lead.